Fri
30
Jul
2004

Charitable Bequests Reach Record High Following Reduction In Estate Taxes

 »  

No votes yet

"Recently released data reveal that charitable bequests have reached a new all-time high since the enactment of the phased-in repeal of the estate tax," said a July 28 Joint Economic Committee release, disputing claims by repeal opponents who have argued that cutting the estate tax will reduce charitable bequests.

Full Text:

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Recently released data reveal that charitable bequests have reached a new all-time high since the enactment of the phased-in repeal of the estate tax, noted Vice- Chairman Jim Saxton today. The data contradict claims of opponents of estate tax repeal who have long argued that cutting the estate tax will reduce charitable bequests.

Charitable bequests reached $21.6 billion in 2003, compared to just $17.2 billion in 1999 (in 2003 inflation-adjusted dollars), representing a 25 percent increase over the last five years. Charitable bequests dropped in only one year, 2001, following the 2000 bursting of the stock market bubble. By comparison, total charitable giving increased by 15 percent over the same time period.

"Opponents of death tax repeal frequently point to the tax deduction for gifts to charity as a reason to retain the levy," Saxton said. "Because the tax law encourages charitable bequests, such opponents argue that any reduction or repeal of estate taxes will adversely affect charitable bequests."

"The new data presented here do not appear to support this contention," continued Saxton. "Supporters of death tax repeal have argued that taxes crowd out charitable giving, as a higher tax bill reduces the amount of after-tax estate left to be given to charity. Supporters of repeal also argue that charitable bequests are greatly affected by the health of the financial markets. Since a large portion of wealthy estates consist of financial assets, a declining stock market (like that which began in 2000) is more likely to affect charitable giving than is the availability of the charitable deduction. These data are consistent with these arguments," Saxton concluded.

Graph

For more information about the estate tax, please visit our website at www.house.gov/jec.

Comments

Fri
30
Jul
2004
121
points
#229778 by PAUL THAYER    

Increase in giving

One rose does not make a summer. Neither does one year of estate tax reduction. My guess is that the increase in giving is temporary and will not be sustained when the tax relief disappears.

Fri
30
Jul
2004
114
points
#229778 by Patrick Green    

Increased charitable bequests

The relative small increase in exemption during this time period would not have affected the charitable giving of a majority of individuals whose estates exceeded the exemption equivalent. Also, it would be interesting to see the dates of execution of the decedent's wills and trusts containing the bequests during this relevant period of time. I would assume that many had not been revised prior to death so the issue of eliminating charitable bequests may not have been addressed prior to death.

Fri
30
Jul
2004
149
points
#229778 by Brian Wodar    

Charitable Bequests and Estate Taxes

There is a big difference between reducing estate taxes and eliminating them. While there continues to be estate taxes, charitable bequests will reduce estate tax bills and will continue to be attractive. When estate taxes are completely eliminated, only the truly philanthropic will make charitable bequests.

Fri
30
Jul
2004
142
points
#229778 by Corrine Barr    

Estate tax

My feeling is that these are bequests that were set up some time ago and now with the lower estate tax, more of the bequest can go to charity and less to taxes. This is a good, but short-term outcome of the reduced estate tax. I still believe that in the long run, there will be less of an incentive to leave bequests if the tax is reduced or eliminated. And therefore may negatively impact bequests to charity.

Fri
30
Jul
2004
141
points
#229778 by Craig Hastings    

Increase in Giving

There's something vaguely immoral about the concept that we ought to keep the estate tax to encourage charitable giving. If it's only being given to avoid tax, then it's not charitable. I continue to believe Americans are the most generous people in the world AND that they will continue to give, estate tax or not, at significant levels provided the economy is robust. The best way to keep an economy robust is to reduce government spending. The only way to do that is to starve it of funds.

Craig Hastings

Fri
30
Jul
2004
113
points
#229778 by Stephen Mathis    

Bequests and Estate Taxes

My experience with receipt of bequests would indicate that it usually takes substantially more than 5 years for the plan to mature into a bequest received. I seriously doubt that the "new data" referred to in the news release has any significant connection to a tax law change as recent as EGTRRA in 2001.

Sat
31
Jul
2004
124
points
#229778 by Robert Hastings    

Increase in giving

This isn't rocket science. Americans are the most generous people on the face of the earth. The more they have, the more they give. Every time taxes have been cut, the "experts" have predicted there would be less charitible giving. Each time they have been proven wrong. I continue to be amazed at the efforts to explain away the results. Robert Hastings

Mon
02
Aug
2004
123
points
#229778 by David Taylor    

Bequests and the reduction of estate taxes

There is seldom a single external force that drives collective human behavior, but a combination of events that describes how or why a group acts in a certain way. Some of these are easily measured (tax returns as an example), others are more difficult. The past 10 years has witnessed a great increase in the number and quality of professionals who are promoting charitable giving. It is entirely possible that the increase in bequests has occured despite the changes in tax law in part because of the effectiveness of fund-raising professionals all across this great land. Also, it would be very interesting to see the dispersion of bequests according to the size of the estate. I am somewhat suspect of the conclusions drawn from summarized data particularly coming from inside the beltway.

RSS Comment Feed